Ship resistance analysis using CFD simulations in Flow-3D

Authors

  • S Deshpande
  • P Sundsbø
  • S Das

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21152/1750-9548.14.3.227

Abstract

While designing the power requirements of a ship, the most important factor to be considered is the ship resistance, or the sea drag forces acting on the ship. It is important to have an estimate of the ship resistance while designing the propulsion system since the power required to overcome the sea drag forces contribute to ‘losses’ in the propulsion system. There are three main methods to calculate ship resistance: Statistical methods like the Holtrop-Mennen (HM) method, numerical analysis or CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) simulations, and model testing, i.e. scaled model tests in towing tanks. At the start of the design stage, when only basic ship parameters are available, only statistical models like the HM method can be used. Numerical analysis/ CFD simulations and model tests can be performed only when the complete 3D design of the ship is completed. The present paper aims at predicting the calm water ship resistance using CFD simulations, using the Flow-3D software package. A case study of a roll-on/roll-off passenger (RoPax) ferry was investigated. Ship resistance was calculated at various ship speeds. Since the mesh affects the results in any CFD simulation, multiple meshes were used to check the mesh sensitivity. The results from the simulations were compared with the estimate from the HM method. The results from simulations agreed well with the HM method for low ship speeds. The difference in the results was considerably high compared to the HM method for higher ship speeds. The capability of Flow-3D to perform ship resistance analysis was demonstrated.

References

K. Min and S. Kang, “Study on the form factor and full-scale ship resistance prediction method,” Journal of Marine Science and Technology, vol. 15, pp. 108-118, June 2010; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-009-0077-y.

A. Molland, S. Turnock and D. Hudson, "Ship Resistance and Propulsion" Second Edition. In Ship Resistance and Propulsion: Practical Estimation of Ship Propulsive Power (pp. 12-69), August 2017, Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316494196.

K. Niklas and H. Pruszko, “Full-scale CFD simulations for the determination of ship resistance as a rational, alternative method to towing tank experiments,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 190, October 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106435.

A. Elkafas, M. Elgohary and A. Zeid, “Numerical study on the hydrodynamic drag force of a container ship model,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 849-859, September 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2019.07.004.

J. Holtrop and G. Mennen, “An approximate power prediction method,” International Shipbuilding Progress, vol. 29, no. 335, pp. 166-170, July 1982, https://doi.org/10.3233/isp-1982-2933501.

E. Bøckmann and S. Steen, “Model test and simulation of a ship with wavefoils,” Applied Ocean research, vol. 57, pp. 8-18, April 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2016.02.002.

K. Atreyapurapu, B. Tallapragada and K. Voonna, “Simulation of a Free Surface Flow over a Container Vessel Using CFD,” International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 334-339, December 2014, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/ijett-v18p269.

J. Petersen, D. Jacobsen and O. Winther, “Statistical modelling for ship propulsion efficiency,” Journal of Marine Science and Technology , vol. 17, pp. 30-39, December 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-011-0151-0.

H. Versteeg and W. Malalasekera, An introduction to computational fluid dynamics : the finite volume method (second edition), Harlow, England: Pearson Education Ltd, 2007.

C. Hirth and B. Nichols, “Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 201-225, January 1981, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5.

A. Nordli and H. Khawaja, “Comparison of Explicit Method of Solution for CFD Euler Problems using MATLAB® and FORTRAN 77,” International Journal of Multiphysics, vol. 13, no. 2, 2019; https://doi.org/10.21152/1750-9548.13.2.203.

FLOW-3D® Version 12.0 Users Manual (2018). FLOW-3D [Computer software]. Santa Fe, NM: Flow Science, Inc. https://www.flow3d.com.

D. McCluskey and A. Holdø, “Optimizing the hydrocyclone for ballast water treatment using computational fluid dynamics,” International Journal of Multiphysics, vol. 3, no. 3, 2009; https://doi.org/10.1260/175095409788922310.

M. Breuer, D. Lakehal and W. Rodi, “Flow around a Surface Mounted Cubical Obstacle: Comparison of Les and Rans-Results,” Computation of Three-Dimensional Complex Flows. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics, vol. 49, p. 1996, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-89838-8_4.

G. Wei, “A FIXED-MESH METHOD FOR GENERAL MOVING OBJECTS IN FLUID FLOW,” Modern Physics Letters B, vol. 19, no. 28, pp. 1719-1722, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1142/S021798490501030X.

J. Michell, “The wave-resistance of a ship,” The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, Vols. 45, 1898, no. 272, pp. 106-123, May 2009; https://doi.org/10.1080/14786449808621111.

Published

2020-09-30

How to Cite

Deshpande, S., Sundsbø, P. and Das, S. (2020) “Ship resistance analysis using CFD simulations in Flow-3D”, The International Journal of Multiphysics, 14(3), pp. 227-236. doi: 10.21152/1750-9548.14.3.227.

Issue

Section

Articles