Efficient aerodynamic shape optimization through free-form mesh morphing and reduced order CFD modeling

S F Peng, Z P Liu, C Y Zhang

Abstract


Although computational power is increasingly available, high-fidelity simulation based aerodynamic shape optimization is still challenging for industrial applications. To make the simulation based optimization acceptable in the practice of engineering design, a technique combining mesh morphing and reduced order modeling is proposed for efficient aerodynamic optimization based on CFD simulations. The former technique avoids the time-consuming procedure of geometry discretization. And the latter speeds up the procedure of field solution by combining pre-computed solution snapshots. To test the efficiency of the proposed method, the windshield of a motorbike is analyzed and optimized. It is shown that even the total number of cells of the mesh is around 0.4 million, the CFD computation and the post processing of the results can be completed in less than 10 seconds if the reduced order model is adopted. Running on a personal computer, the generic algorithm is applied to optimize the profile of the windshield. A 8% reduction of the drag coefficient is achieved after 800 queries of the reduced order CFD model and the total CPU time is only around 2 hours. 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Lassila T., A. Manzoni, A. Quarteroni and G. Rozza.Model Order Reduction in Fluid Dynamics: Challenges and Perspectives.Reduced Order Methods for Modeling and Computational Reduction, edited by Alfio Quarteroni and Gianluigi Rozza. 2014, pp.235-273. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02090-7_9

Sederberg T. W., and S. R. Parry.. Free-form Deformation of Solid Geometric Models. ACM SIGGRAPH computer graphics 20(1986),pp.151-160. https://doi.org/10.1145/15886.15903

Versteeg H.K., W. Malalasekera, An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics, the Finite Volume Method, Pearson Education Limited, 2007.

Iaccarino G., Predictions of a Turbulent Separated Flow Using Commercial CFD Codes, J. Fluids Eng. 123(2001), pp.819–828. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1400749

Weller H.G., G. Tabor, H. Jasak, C. Fureby,. A Tensorial Approach to Computational Continuum Mechanics using Object-oriented Techniques, Comput. Phys. 12(1998), pp.620–631. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.168744

Holmes P., J.L. Lumley, G. Berkooz,. Turbulence, Coherent Structures, Dynamical Systems and Symmetry, 1996, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511622700

Sirovich L.,. Turbulence and the Dynamics of Coherent Structures. Parts I–III, Quart. Appl. Math. 45(1987), pp.561–590.

Aubry N., P. Holmes, J. Lumley, E. Stone, The Dynamics of Coherent Structures in the Wall Region of a Turbulent Boundary Layer, J. Fluid Mech. 192(1988), pp.115–173. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112088001818

Berkooz G., P. Holmes, J.L. Lumley,. The Proper Orthogonal Decomposition in the Analysis of Turbulent Flows, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 25(1993), pp.539–575. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fl.25.010193.002543

Lumley J.L., 1967. The Structure of Inhomogeneous Turbulent Flows, in: Atmospheric Turbulence and Radio Wave Propagation 1967, pp. 166–178.

Cazemier W., R.W.C.P. Verstappen, A.E.P. Veldman, Proper Orthogonal Decomposition and Low-dimensional Models for Driven Cavity Flows, Phys. Fluids 10(1998), pp.1685–1699. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.869686

Kunisch K., S. Volkwein, Galerkin Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Methods for a General Equation in Fuid Dynamics, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 40(2003), pp.492–515. https://doi.org/10.1137/s0036142900382612

Weller J., E. Lombardi, M. Bergmann, A. Iollo, Numerical Methods for Low-order Modeling of Fuid Flows Based on POD, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 63(2010),pp. 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.2025

Wang Z., I. Akhtar, J. Borggaard, T. Iliescu, Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Closure Models for Turbulent Fows: a Numerical Comparison, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 237–240(2012.), pp.10–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2012.04.015

Bui-Thanh, T., Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Extensions and Their Applications in Steady Aerodynamics, Ph.D. thesis. 2003. Singapore-MIT Alliance.

Dolci, V., and R. Arina. Proper Orthogonal Decomposition as Surrogate Model for Aerodynamic Optimization", Int. J. Aerospace Eng. 3(2016), pp.1-15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8092824

Broomhead D.S. and D. Lowe. Multivariable Functional Interpolation and Adaptive Networks, Complex Systems 2(1988), pp. 321–355.

Salmoiraghi F., A. Scardigli, H. Telib and G. Rozza,. Free-form Deformation, Mesh Morphing and Reduced-order Methods: Enablers for Efficient Aerodynamic Shape Optimization, Int. J. Comput. Fluid D. 32(2018), pp.233-247. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618562.2018.1514115




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21152/1750-9548.13.4.327

Copyright (c) 2019 S F Peng, Z P Liu, C Y Zhang

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.