Numerical analysis of a divergent duct with high enthalpy transonic cross injection

Authors

  • S Ramechecandane
  • C Balaji
  • P Venkateshan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1260/1750-9548.6.1.17

Abstract

In the present study, an aerothermodynamic analysis of high-speed flow fields through a divergent duct (similar to a supersonic combustor: hereafter referred to as supersonic combustor in the paper), without injection and with high enthalpy cross injection, has been performed. Initially, the thermal and flow analyses of the combustor are carried out by passing vitiated air at a temperature of 607.5 K, and this is followed by a computational analysis of the interaction of the flow field with the structure, when high enthalpy air is injected. The flow is turbulent in the combustor and the k-ω model has been considered to be appropriate for such cases, as it can resolve vorticity and highly strained flows. The study also emphasizes on the advantages of two-dimensional modelling over three dimensional modelling for cold flow cases in supersonic combustors, which could serve as an alternative, for wind tunnel tests as well as computationally expensive three dimensional numerical analysis. A comparison of various turbulence models for supersonic flows without cross injection has been carried out to arrive at the suitable model. For the cases of cross/transverse injection, the Mach numbers considered for investigation are 2, 2.5 and 3. The pressure, temperature and heat flux predictions for the cases with and without injection compare well with the experimental results.

References

Anderson, J. D., Computational Fluid Dynamics, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1997.

Igra, L. W., Falcovitz. J., "Non Stationary Compressible Flow in Ducts with Varying Cross-Section", IMechE, vol. 212, 1998, pp. 225-243. https://doi.org/10.1243/0954410981532405

Mitani. T., Kanda. T., Hiraiwa. T., Tomioka. S., Chinzei. N., "Mach 6 Testing of a Scramjet Engine Model", Journal of Propulsion and Power, vol. 13, 1997, pp. 543-551. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5201

Mitani. T., Kanda. T., Hiraiwa. T., Igarashi. Y., Kazuhiro. N., "Drags in Scramjet Engine Testing: Experimental and Computational Fluid Dynamics Studies", Journal of Propulsion and Power, vol. 15, 1999, pp. 578-583. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5466

Mitani. T., Kanda. T., Tomioka. S., Tani. K., and Sunami. T., "Mach 6 Testing of a Scramjet Engine Model", Journal of Propulsion and Power, vol. 17, 2001, pp. 132-138. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5718

Drummond. J. P., Diskin. G. S., Cutler. J. D., "Fuel-Air Mixing and Combustion in Scramjets", AIAA, 2002, pp. 3878.

Northam. G. B., Capriotti. D. P., "Evaluation of Parallel Injector Configurations for Mach 2 Configuration", Journal of Propulsion and Power, vol. 8, 1992, pp. 491-499. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.23503

Claus. R. W., Vanka. S. P., "Multigrid Calculations of a Jet in Cross Flow", Journal of Propulsion and Power, vol. 8, 1992, pp. 425-431. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.23495

Reinartz. B. U., Koschel. W. W., "Thermal Analysis of Fluid - Structural Interaction in High - Speed Engine Flowfields", Journal of Propulsion and Power, vol. 17, 2001, pp. 1339-1346. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5884

Von Lavante. E., Zeitz. D., Kallenberg. M., "Numerical Simulation of Supersonic Airflow with Transverse Hydrogen Injection", Journal of Propulsion and Power, vol. 17, 2001, pp. 1319-1327. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5881

Burton Northam. G., Capriotti. D. P., "Evaluation of Parallel Injector Configurations for Mach 2 Combustion", Journal of Propulsion and Power, vol. 8, 1992, pp. 491-499. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.23503

FLUENT 6.2 user's guide. Fluent Inc., USA, 2005.

GAMBIT 6.2 user's guide. Fluent Inc., USA, 2005.

Published

2012-03-31

How to Cite

Ramechecandane, S., Balaji, C. and Venkateshan, P. (2012) “Numerical analysis of a divergent duct with high enthalpy transonic cross injection”, The International Journal of Multiphysics, 6(1), pp. 17-28. doi: 10.1260/1750-9548.6.1.17.

Issue

Section

Articles