Numerical Parametric Study of Hydrodynamic Ram


  • Y Kwon
  • K Yun



A numerical parametric study was conducted to better understand the Hydrodynamic Ram (HRAM) event. The model considered a projectile penetrating a box which contains water either partially or fully. A standard model was developed and validated against the available experimental data. Then, each parameter was varied individually to determine its effect during the HRAM event. The parameters considered were the water filling level in the box, its wall thickness, projectile impact velocity, projectile mass, impact angle, and projectile shape. The effect of each individual parameter was studied, and the effects of different parameters were compared. Then, an attempt was made to predict the combined effects of multi-variables. Even though the results and discussion are for the specific geometric and material data used in this study, the present findings are expected to provide valuable insights to the qualitative characteristics of the HRAM event.


Fuhs, A. E., Ball, R. E., and Power, H. L., “FY 73 Hydraulic Ram Studies”, NPS-57Fu74021, 1974.

Power, H. L., “FY 74 Experimental Hydraulic Ram Studies”, NPS-57Ph74081, 1974.

Ball, R. E., “Prediction of the Response of the Exit Wall of the NWC 50 Cubic Feet Tank to Hydraulic Ram”, NPS Report, NPS-57BP74031, 1974.

Ball, R. E., “Aircraft Fuel Tank Vulnerability to Hydraulic Ram: Modification Of The Northrop Finite Element Computer Code Br-1 To Include Fluid- Structure Interaction—Theory and User's Manual for Br-1hr”, NPS-57Bp74071, 1974.

Power, H. L., “FY 75 Experimental Hydraulic Ram Studies”, NPS-57Ph75061, 1975.

Page, B., “Entry Wall Strain Measurements During Hydraulic Ram”, Master’s Thesis, NPS,1975.

Patterson, J. W., “Fuel Cell Pressure Loading During Hydraulic Ram”, Master’s Thesis, NPS, 1975.

Duva, A. N., “Hydraulic Ram Effect on Composite Fuel Entry Walls”, Master’s Thesis, NPS, 1976.

Ezzard, H. S. Jr., “A Study of the Failure of Joints in Composite Material Fuel Cells due to Hydraulic Ram Loading”, Master’s Thesis, NPS, 1976.

Kimsey, K. D., 1980, “Numerical Simulation of Hydrodynamic Ram,” U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, Report No. ARBRL-TR-02217.

Sparks, C. E., Hinrichsen, R. L., and Friedmann, D., 2005, “Comparison and Validation of Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) and Coupled Euler Lagrange (CEL) Techniques for Modeling Hydrodynamic Ram,” AIAA Paper No. 2005-2331.

Varas, D., Zaera, R., and Lopez-Puente, J., 2009, “Numerical Modelling of the Hydrodynamic Ram Phenomenon,” Int. J. Impact Eng., 36(3), pp. 363–374.

Liang, C., Bifeng, S., and Yang, P., 2011, “Simulation Analysis of Hydrodynamic Ram Phenomenon in Composite Fuel Tank to Fragment Impact,” 3rd International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation (ICMTMA), Shanghai, China, Jan. 6–7, pp. 241–244.

Poehlmann-Martins, F., Gabrys, J., and Souli, M., 2005, “Hydrodynamic Ram Analysis of Non-Exploding Projectile Impacting Water,” ASME Paper No. PVP2005-71658.

Vignjevic, R., De, V. T., Campbell, J. C., and Bourne, N. K., 2002, “Modelling of Impact on a Fuel Tank Using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics,” 5th Conference on Dynamics and Control of Systems and Structures in Space (DCSSS),Kings College, Cambridge, UK, July 18–22.

LS-DYNA keyword user’s manual: nonlinear dynamic analysis of structures. Version 971, vols 1 and 2. Livermore Software Technology Corporation; May 2007.

Johnson GR, Cook WH. A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates, and temperatures. In: Proceedings of seventh international symposium, The Hague, The Netherlands; 1983. p. 1–7.



How to Cite

Kwon, Y. and Yun, K. (2017) “Numerical Parametric Study of Hydrodynamic Ram”, The International Journal of Multiphysics, 11(1), pp. 15-48. doi: 10.21152/1750-9548.11.1.15.